Climatic Change

, Volume 97, Issue 3, pp 529–541

Potential climate change effects on warm-season livestock production in the Great Plains

  • Terry L. Mader
  • Katrina L. Frank
  • John A. HarringtonJr.
  • G. Leroy Hahn
  • John A. Nienaber
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9615-1

Cite this article as:
Mader, T.L., Frank, K.L., Harrington, J.A. et al. Climatic Change (2009) 97: 529. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9615-1

Abstract

Projected production responses were derived for confined swine and beef and for milk-producing dairy cattle based on climate change projections in daily ambient temperature. Milk production from dairy cattle and the number of days to grow swine and beef cattle were simulated. Values were obtained for three central United States transects and three climate scenarios which were based on projected mean daily ambient temperatures associated with a baseline, doubling, and tripling of atmospheric greenhouse gas (CO2) levels for the period June 1 to October 31. For swine, a slight northwest to southeast gradient is evident. Transect 1 (west side) shows no losses under the doubling scenario and losses up to 22.4% under the tripling scenario. Transect 3 (east side) displays losses of over 70% under the tripling scenario. For beef, positive benefits were simulated in Transect 1 with increasing temperatures, although a northwest to southeast gradient was also evident. For dairy, no positive benefits in milk production were found due to climate effects. Projected production declines ranged from 1% to 7.2%, depending on location. However, ranges in predicted differences were less than those simulated for beef and swine. These simulations suggest regional differences in animal production due to climate change will be apparent. For small changes in climate conditions, animals will likely be able to adapt, while larger changes in climate conditions will likely dictate that management strategies be implemented. Exploration of the effects of climate changes on livestock should allow producers to adjust management strategies to reduce potential impact and economic losses due to environmental changes.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry L. Mader
    • 1
  • Katrina L. Frank
    • 2
  • John A. HarringtonJr.
    • 3
  • G. Leroy Hahn
    • 4
  • John A. Nienaber
    • 4
  1. 1.Northeast Research and Extension CenterUniversity of NebraskaConcordUSA
  2. 2.Center for Climatic Research, Department of GeographyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeographyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS-USDAClay CenterNEUSA