Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.
The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus
Authors:
Thomas C. Peterson AffiliationsNOAA/National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina William M. Connolley Affiliations
British Antarctic Survey, National Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom John Fleck Affiliations
Albuquerque Journal, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Published Online: 1 September 2008
September 2008

Share this Article
Featured Collections
Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) -BAMS, JAMC,MWR, WAF
LatMix -BAMS, JPO, JTECH
PANDOWAE -MWR, JAS, WAF, JTECH
Most Read BAMS Articles
(past 12 months)
. |
Kieper et al.
March 2016, Vol. 97, No. 3
|
. |
Albrecht et al.
November 2016, Vol. 97, No. 11
|
. |
Lang et al.
EOR
|
. |
Hart et al.
May 2016, Vol. 97, No. 5
|
. |
Hourdin et al.
EOR
|
. |
The “Pause” in Global Warming: Turning a Routine Fluctuation into a Problem for Science
(2637 times)
Lewandowsky et al.
May 2016, Vol. 97, No. 5
|
Most Cited (past 12 months)
-
1. The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis ProjectKalnay et al.March 1996, Vol. 77, No. 3 -
2. An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment DesignTaylor et al.April 2012, Vol. 93, No. 4 -
3. A Practical Guide to Wavelet AnalysisTorrence et al.January 1998, Vol. 79, No. 1 -
4. The NCEP Climate Forecast System ReanalysisSaha et al.August 2010, Vol. 91, No. 8 -
5. NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2)Kanamitsu et al.November 2002, Vol. 83, No. 11 -
6. A Pacific Interdecadal Climate Oscillation with Impacts on Salmon ProductionMantua et al.June 1997, Vol. 78, No. 6